The NDAA, a Legal Analysis

/in /by

The N.D.A.A, or the National Defense Authorization Act is not what you think it is. It’s worse. To put it in emotional terms the NDAA is the mark of living under tyranny. You now can be detained, or murdered by your government without the due process rights as stipulated in the Constitution. However, the Constitutional scholars in the Justice Department (you know the ones who have taken an oath to uphold and defend the constitution) believe that the N.D.A.A. is entirely Constitutional and doesn’t violate our rights. Inspires confidence. Doesn’t it?

Sections 1021 and 1022 of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has caused a great deal of controversy. Congressmen all over the nation have defended their vote in favor of these sections in spite of the criticism that these sections allow the President to detain US Citizens indefinitely. These Congressmen have said over and over again, with great vigor, that these sections specifically exclude US Citizens. They justify their position by quoting language from these sections that many experts, from all across the political spectrum, believe to be vague and potentially dangerous.

In an effort to shed light on these highly controversial sections, I have created a video presentation that will walk the viewer through these sections.

I am hoping that We The People will become better informed about these potentially dangerous sections and in turn, educate our elected representatives so that we can all work together to secure the blessings of Liberty for our Posterity.

Many have said that these provisions are necessary to fight terrorism. Terrorism or not, Americans are entitled to Constitutional protections and simply invoking the term terrorism should not nullify the age-old right to due process. We should never trade Liberty for security. In the words of William Pitt: “Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”

Please stand for Liberty. Share this video with all who will hear and even with those who appear disinterested. Liberty is worth the inconvenience. It is not our Liberty, it belongs to our future.

Reclaiming Our Constitution

/in , /by

[product_page id=”5584″]

The Path to Restoring America

/in , /by

[product_page id=”5583″]

Rediscover Your Bill of Rights

/in , /by

[product_page id=”5204″]

Liberty Reaching Escape Velocity!

/in /by

Rockets have to reach 17,000 mph to escape earth’s gravitational field. It’s called escape velocity and I’m going to share with you in today’s broadcast the events and the doors that are opening for Liberty First that is pushing the message of liberty up through the stratosphere approaching escape velocity. Now that’s all I’m going to say. If you want to learn the details you’re going to have to click the play button. But let me warn you, the news is pretty exciting, so make sure you’re sitting down.

Indoctrination Destroys Liberty

/in /by

I took a bit of heat from yesterdays broadcast about the critical comments I made regarding the round table discussion between some TV talking heads about the 4th Amendment. Let me be clear my critique was not a personal attack. I don’t think they’re bad people. I don’t think that they had malicious intentions. In fact they’re probably supportive of liberty. All I was trying to say was that they were not properly informed and that given their position of prominence they have an obligation to be properly informed. The 4th Amendment does not make exceptions but they’re exposing millions of Americans to inaccurate information because they’ve been indoctrinated. They’ve grown up and have been taught these types of exceptions as the norm. They don’t know any different. They don’t even know what they don’t know. There’s more.

Exceptions to the 4th Amendment?

/in /by

There are some very informed people, “kind-of” on TV. The problem is that many people give a lot of credence to what they hear on TV and will take it for gospel, when it is not accurate at all. For example during a recent Glenn Beck show a discussion took place about the 4th Amendment and illegal search and seizures. You’re going to hear an audio clip from from this segment and then you’ll hear me comment about how they’re improperly informing people about the 4th Amendment. You’ll notice the ease by which they talk about exceptions to the 4th Amendment. The problem is that many will take this as gospel just because they saw it on TV. I mean can we get a real Constitutional expert to help keep the talking heads from broadcasting incorrect information? I’m just saying. There’s more.

Constitutional Misconceptions

/in /by

You become a powerful and credible proponent of liberty the more you know about the specific details of the Constitution. I’m not saying you have to be a Constitutional attorney but you have to go beyond just reading the Constitution and actually study the Constitution. To that end I’m going to dispel some of the common myths about the Constitution. For example, we do not have three co-equal branches of government. The Constitution did not create three equal branches of government. The Constitution actually intended the House of Representative to be the most powerful, followed by the Executive branch and lastly the Judicial branch. Did you know this? There’s more.

Constitutional Misconceptions can also be listened to on YouTube