art supreme court

Beyond the Headlines: What Trump v. J.G.G. and A.A.R.P. v. Trump Really Mean for America

/in /by

by KrisAnne Hall, JD

In the recent Supreme Court Opinions surrounding the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act, the Supreme Court has sent a powerful and unified message—even amid its internal disagreements: the federal government is not above the Constitution or the rule of law. In both Trump v. J.G.G. and A.A.R.P. v. Trump, the Justices, including those often seen on opposite ends of the judicial spectrum, made one thing clear—due process is not optional, even in matters of national security.

The differences between the Justices are real—but they are not rooted in the principle of whether due process must be upheld. Rather, the disagreement lies in the mechanisms and timing of enforcement. Justice Alito, though dissenting in the emergency stay issued in A.A.R.P., joined the majority in J.G.G., affirming that individuals facing deportation are entitled to meaningful notice and the ability to challenge their removal through habeas corpus. Despite their differences, the majority of the Court agreed on a foundational truth: the federal government must respect and submit to the rule of law.

Yet in the court of public opinion, a troubling argument continues to echo—“But what about the victims?” It’s the idea that certain individuals—because of their group identity, immigration status, or mere proximity to wrongdoing—can or should be denied due process simply because others who look like them or followed the same path have broken the law. This line of reasoning is not justice—it’s guilt by association.  That is not Liberty, that is Marxist-communism.

We’ve seen this rationale before—always cloaked in urgency, always ending in tragedy.

  • During World War II, Japanese Americans were forced into internment camps without evidence of wrongdoing, without trial, and without basic legal protections—simply because others of their ancestry were deemed a threat.

  • In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Court infamously ruled that Black Americans had no legal standing, no right to due process—not because of their actions, but because of who they were.

In both cases, the government denied due process by deciding who was and wasn’t “deserving” of legal protection.

We are watching it happen again in our time. Many Americans arrested in connection with January 6, 2021, have been held without trial for extended periods, denied bail, subjected to pretrial punishment, and in some cases, prosecuted not for violence, but for association. Regardless of what one believes about that day, we must not overlook the rule of law simply because we dislike the accused. The same system that denies one man a fair trial today can deny you one tomorrow.

Denying rights based on the misconduct of others turns justice into a tool of power, not a protection of liberty. It grants government the dangerous authority to judge not by evidence, but by assumption. The Constitution was not designed to be convenient—it was designed to restrain government, even when it feels inconvenient.

This is not a question of partisanship. It is a question of principle. The Constitution is a contract that binds the government, and when due process becomes a privilege granted by the federal government instead of a right guaranteed to the people, Liberty is no longer secure for anyone.

It’s easy to defend the rights of those we agree with. But the real test of Liberty is whether we’ll defend the rule of law for those we fear or dislike. As one Socratic question reminds us: Can we really say we have Liberty if the government decides who does and doesn’t get due process?

The Court has spoken—not with one voice, but with one conviction: the rule of law stands above the rule of men. The American people must be just as resolute. Because if we wait to defend due process until it’s our turn to need it, it may already be gone.

KrisAnneHall.com 2025

The Shot Heard Round the World: It Was Never About Taxes

/in /by

by KrisAnne Hall, JD

Today marks 250 years since the Shot Heard Round the World. On the morning of April 19, 1775, British troops—acting under orders to disarm the people—marched on Lexington and Concord. But they met resistance. Not from armies, but from fathers, farmers, pastors, and merchants who refused to surrender the one thing they could not live without: Liberty.

The Battle of Lexington was not provoked by a tax dispute. It was provoked by tyranny. The British had already passed a series of laws—the Coercive Acts, the Stamp Act, the Tea Act—each of which was just one symptom of a larger disease: the assumption of unlimited power by a distant government and the erosion of the people’s right to self-govern.

Let us be very clear: the founders were not incited to revolution over pennies. They were incited to action because their fundamental rights as Englishmen were violated. What the colonists faced then is what we are facing now—not excessive taxation, but lawless government power. Not the loss of comfort, but the loss of conscience, self-determination, and truth.

“If Taxes are laid upon us in any shape without our having a legal Representation… are we not reduced from the Character of free Subjects to the miserable State of tributary Slaves?”
— Samuel Adams, May 15, 1764

But Adams didn’t stop there. He made plain what was truly at stake—not money, but the eternal, unalienable rights of every person:

“Among the natural rights of the Colonists are these: First, a right to life; Secondly, to liberty; Thirdly, to property; together with the right to support and defend them in the best manner they can. These are evident branches of, rather than deductions from, the duty of self-preservation, commonly called the first law of nature.”
— Samuel Adams, Nov. 20, 1772

Was it the money that caused our founders to demand independence? No. It was the erosion of Liberty. The violation of sound principles of government. One quick look at the Declaration of Independence will tell the tale:

“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another… a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
— Declaration of Independence

It was not about tax—it was about tyranny. It was the King consolidating all power, coercing Parliament, eliminating representative government, and ruling by fiat. It was the breakdown of the balance of powers. And when one man governs all, Liberty dies.

How does that compare to the government we see today?

Just as King George trampled the people’s rights through legislative manipulation and executive domination, America now has a Congress that is unwilling to fulfill its solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution. They invent crisis after crisis to deceive the people into believing that more government power and limitless spending are necessary.

“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”
— William Pitt the Younger, 1783

Our Congress shirks responsibility, evades accountability, and expands its own reach while failing to act with “manly firmness” as the Declaration demanded. The result? A Congress that has become the very tyrant our forefathers warned about—and a people slipping into the psyche of servitude.

“He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant… for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.”
“He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.”
“He has suspended our own Legislatures, and declared themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.”
— Declaration of Independence

America now has a Congress refusing to protect the people. One of the few legitimate powers delegated to the federal government is to provide for the common defense—yet they refuse to secure the border or address foreign and domestic threats. Instead, they use those threats as justification to limit our Liberty.

“He has refused for a long time… to cause others to be elected… the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.”
— Declaration of Independence

Time and again, hearings expose irrefutable evidence of lawlessness among government agents, yet nothing is done. No one is held accountable. The rule of law is replaced with the rule of political convenience.

“He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.”
— Declaration of Independence

Just as the King sent “swarms of officers” to harass the colonists, our federal government still operate with multiple regulatory agencies and task forces, who issue binding rules without legislative authority or accountability.

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”
— Declaration of Independence

From the EPA ignoring due process to the prosecution of Americans under foreign regulatory laws—as in the case of Abner Schoenwetter—the parallels are undeniable.

“He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution… giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.”
— Declaration of Independence

Trial by jury is increasingly denied or diluted through laws like the Patriot Act, NDAA, and Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. Due process is sacrificed on the altar of national security theater.

“For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury… For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences.”
— Declaration of Independence

And the rise of militarized federal agencies—immune from accountability and independent of civil control—would horrify our founders.

“He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.”
— Declaration of Independence

The truth is clear: our federal government has strayed far from its constitutional moorings. The very abuses that compelled our founders to separate from Britain are once again embedded in American governance. Our founders did not wait for the abuse to become total—neither should we.

“In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury.”
— Declaration of Independence

A Call to Action

There is a growing number of Americans who feel we have been ignored too long. Tired of being silent while the liberties of our children are sacrificed at the altar of political pragmatism. But the courage to overcome that silence is growing. And when the need for true liberty and real self-governance overrides the desire for comfort, the people will recover their God-given rights from the clutches of a legislative body focused only upon power, personal wealth, and control. Then we will not quit until the task is complete. We will be resolved to give our last breath in the defense of Liberty.

It is time, America, to put Liberty FIRST.
It is time, America, to reclaim what truly makes America Great and what our founders sacrificed all to give to us.

“If ye love wealth better than liberty… may your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
— Samuel Adams

Do we want Liberty or do we want slavery? The choice is just that simple—because it has never been about the money. It has always been about the principle. About the truth. About the right of every person to be free.

Learn the Truth. Share the Truth. Live the Truth.

If this message stirs your heart, don’t let it end here. Share this truth with your family, your friends, and your community. Teach your children the real history—not the edited textbooks, but the truth that Liberty is a gift from God and a responsibility of the people. Visit LibertyFirstSociety.com to dive deeper into these truths, take our constitutional training courses, and equip yourself to stand boldly in defense of Liberty—just as our founders did 250 years ago.

Let the echo of that first shot in Lexington be heard in our generation—not through violence, but through knowledge, courage, and unwavering dedication to the cause of Liberty.

“Charting the Course for Liberty in the New Year”

/in /by

“Charting the Course for Liberty in the New Year”
By KrisAnne Hall, JD

As we begin this new year, let us light the flame of Liberty in our hearts and face the challenges ahead with courage and determination. These are not ordinary times—they are moments that call for greatness, for standing firm, and for fighting for the liberty that is our birthright. We carry a legacy built on sacrifice and resolve, and it is our duty to protect it with everything we have.
Mercy Otis Warren, one of the most respected founding women of America, reminds us how much strength is needed for such a cause: “I have my fears. Yet, notwithstanding the complicated difficulties that rise before us, there is no receding; and I should blush if in any instance the weak passions of my sex should damp the fortitude, the patriotism, and the manly resolution of yours.” Her bravery shows us that fear must not hold us back from fully committing to protect liberty. What we do now will echo for generations.

Liberty is no ordinary treasure; it is the foundation of everything we hold dear. The founders knew this and stood strong against tyranny even when the odds were against them. “The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph,” wrote Thomas Paine. Their sacrifices remind us that the rewards of freedom are worth every effort, and we must face our challenges with the same spirit.

Liberty is not something we simply inherit; it is a responsibility we must act on, as Samuel Adams told us. “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks,” he said. We must guard liberty as fiercely as a parent protects their child, because without it, everything else falls apart.

Liberty is not a gift to be taken for granted; it is a treasure, gifted to us by the Author of that Liberty and it must be fiercely protected. Benjamin Franklin once said, “I have lived, Sir, a long time and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without [H]is notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without [H]is aid?” These words remind us that the liberty we cherish is not only a human endeavor but one underpinned by divine providence. Every generation has the responsibility to safeguard this jewel with care and resolve. When liberty is threatened, we cannot stand by. We must face the threat head-on, because once freedom is lost, it is nearly impossible to regain.

Joseph Warren’s words challenge us even today: “Our country is in danger, but not to be despaired of. On you depend the fortunes of America. You are to decide the important question, on which rests the happiness and liberty of millions yet unborn. Act worthy of yourselves.” His message reminds us of the weight of our responsibility and the honor of our cause.

Great challenges make great people, as Abigail Adams wisely said. “These are the times in which a genius would wish to live. It is not in the still calm of life, or the repose of a pacific station, that great characters are formed. The habits of a vigorous mind are formed in contending with difficulties,” she declared. Her words inspire us to see hard times not as burdens but as chances to grow stronger and more committed.

But we cannot rely on elected officials to save America for us. The founders did not fight for liberty so that we could hand over its defense to others. They showed us how to be the leaders our country needs by standing firm in their beliefs and taking action. Liberty will only survive through our own courage and leadership.

Let us look to the founders, who believed that liberty was worth every hardship. “Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter,” said Samuel Adams. “Instead of sitting down satisfied with small efforts, let us elevate our minds to the dignity of that glorious cause to which we are engaged.”

As we move into this year, let us reject mediocrity and complacency. Let us rise to meet the moment, drawing strength from the sacrifices of those before us and committing to a future of freedom and justice. The fight for liberty is not something of the past; it is a living, breathing mission that demands all our effort. Stand firm. Lead by example. Inspire others to join the cause. Together, we can keep the torch of liberty burning bright for generations to come.

TSA Precheck

/in /by

For those who have expressed concerns over the overly broad permissions given to TSA through the Precheck and Global Entry programs and asked for guidance for withdrawing consent:

 

NOTE:
If you wish to withdraw your participation in any precheck program, please send the
following email to the listed recipients. Please take note, there is NO GUARANTEE that
the federal government will comply with any of these requests. However, having these
requests in writing will aid any attorney you may hire in the future if the federal
government attempts to use your participation in this program as a way to unlawfully
and unconstitutionally surveil or seize your person or property.

Recipients:
CLEARCustomerSupport@tsa.dhs.gov, TSA-ContactCenter@dhs.gov,
tsaprivacy@dhs.gov, privacy@dhs.gov, ssi@dhs.gov
Subject Line: Notice of Withdrawal from TSA Precheck Program

Body:
To Whom It May Concern:

My name is _____________. My Known Traveler (Clear or Global Precheck) Number is
______________. I am writing to withdraw my participation in this program. I no longer
wish to have TSA Precheck access.

Because I am withdrawing my participation in this program, I am also withdrawing my
consent for the TSA, Department of Homeland Security, and any other federal agency
or agent to engage in the search, seizure, or collection of my private personal
information, from this day forward, to include but not be limited to:

I am withdrawing my consent for government access to my personal information, data,
internet activity, social media, financial, medical, psychological, any and all digital
communications; to include but not be limited to cell phone transmissions of any kind,
text message, emails, video messaging, internet activity, etc…

Finally, I am removing my consent for the TSA, Department of Homeland Security, and
any other federal agency or agent to retain any of my personal information and/or
property. Please immediately and securely destroy any and all of my personal data
and/or property that may currently be in the possession of the TSA, Department of
Homeland Security, and any other federal agency or agent.

Because I am withdrawing consent to any search and/or seizure of my personal
information and/or property, please be on notice that any search and/or seizure of my
personal information/and or property will be invalid, unconstitutional, and unlawful
without a proper warrant that complies with the terms and conditions of the 4 th
Amendment of the US Bill of Rights and the Supreme Court of the United States in
Torres v. Madrid (2021), Caniglia v. Strom (2021), Carpenter v. United States (2018).

If you have any questions or need any additional information to complete my withdrawal
from this program, please contact me immediately. If I receive no further contact from
you, I will hold to the conclusion that my participation and consent have been
successfully and completely withdrawn.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]

 

 

PDF Version  Word Version

Thank You, Liberty First Warriors!

/in /by

I just wanted to say thank you to all our warriors in the Liberty First movement.  You keep me going. Your dedication to learning about and defending our constitutional rights gives me hope for my son’s future – because YOU will never quit!

RECENT EVENTS

Over the past month, I’ve had the privilege of meeting many of you at events in Houston, Fredericksburg, Nashville, Grand Rapids, Kansas City, and here in Florida.

While in Nashville I spoke at the Content Film in Motion Summit about our award-winning documentary NONCOMPLIANT and attended the National Religious Broadcasters convention with Victory News to cover Donald Trump’s speech at the event.

We also had an amazing event with Tennessee Citizens for State Sovereignty where citizens and legislators are working to give legislative teeth to nullification.

I hope to see you at some of these UPCOMING EVENTS:

Same America Conference, April 5 Tampa, FL – We will be at the New Tampa Republican Club to equipping patriots to fight the border invasion that has spilled into all our states.

Ozarks Conservative Convention, April 13 Springfield, MO – Training patriots to defend their rights through Nullification.

To Learn More Visit our events page https://www.krisannehall.com/events/category/upcoming-events/

TV AND PODCASTS

And tune-in for my regular appearances on Victory News, The Kate Dalley Show, QuiteFrankly, and Court TV

https://rumble.com/v3vq8iy-krisannes-interview-with-oann-is-the-1st-amendment-dead.html

https://www.courttv.com

https://victorynews.govictory.com

https://www.katedalleyshow.com/meet-the-co-hosts/

https://www.quitefrankly.tv

BECOME A LIBERTY FIRST WARRIOR

Your membership at  Liberty First Society is what makes this all possible. We are in the process of expanding the site and our mission. If you haven’t already, let us equip you with the foundation to defend liberty for our children and grandchildren. As a member, you’ll gain access to exclusive resources and training and play an even bigger role in our mission to defend the Constitution. SIGN UP NOW

LEGAL WORK

During the lockdowns we had the privilege of helping keep churches open. One of those was in Latvia! We finally got to visit that church in March!

Learn more about our daily work at Liberty First Legal

 

GEAR UP FOR THE FIGHT!

As a Liberty First Warrior, you deserve to be outfitted with the best resources available. Visit our online store https://shop.krisannehall.com to stock up on books, DVDs, and apparel that will help you spread the message of freedom far and wide. Your purchase directly supports our shared mission.

SHOP NOW

Thank you for being a hero in the fight for liberty. Your courage and dedication are making a real difference in restoring our nation to its constitutional foundations.

In Liberty,

KrisAnne Hall

Ohio Sheriff Warns of Terror Threats

/in /by
Read more

Texas Upholding the Law of the Land

/in /by
Read more

Restrict Act – Expanding Bureaucratic Power

/in /by

Restrict Act – Expanding Bureaucratic Power

Restrict Act 2023 S. 686

By KrisAnne Hall, Constitutional Attorney

KrisAnneHall.com

Under the previous “Chevron” judicial precedent Congress granted great power to executive agencies and their department heads.  Deferring to the judgment of unelected bureaucrats, Congress wrote law after law expanding executive agencies’ ability to weild unchecked power. This administrative state has wreaked immeasurable havoc on the liberties of everyday Americans.  Finally, through a series of Opinions, SCOTUS overturned the Chevron precedent and declared that federal agencies must be able to point to specific Congressional authorization for their actions. Courts should be “skeptical,” the decision said, of these agencies’ authority to set broad policy through novel statutory approaches.  SCOTUS moved the pendulum of power back in the direction of the proper Constitutional limits of separation of powers and delegation of powers.

In the alleged fight against the Chinese Communist Party, certain members of Congress through the Restrict Act, will reverse the SCOTUS corrections and push the pendulum back in the direction of arbitrary, unlimited, and unchecked bureaucratic authority.    Apparently certain members of Congress have become comfortable and accustomed to creating dangerous and unlimited power within these ungovernable executive department heads through “novel statutory approaches.”  By authorizing broad executive interpretation, Congress surrenders its own authority to bureaucrats and sidesteps accountability after unleashing these already lawless agencies.

We’ve watched in recent months numerous hearings featuring Congressional representatives attempting to reign in lawless agencies and their leaders. Now they want to empower another executive to wreak havoc across the landscape of American Liberty.  Talk about a disconnect! Why  in the fight against the “enemies” of America do the liberties of Americans always end up in the crosshairs?

The Restrict Act is an eggregious assault on American liberty. It adds unlimited and overbroad authority to the Secretary of Commerce. It secures no true check and balance. It sidesteps due process protections. It creates enormous loopholes which circumvent every constitutional limitation placed upon government. Here are just a few goodies in this new Patriot Act Lite:

  • Gives the government authority over all forms of communication domestic or abroad.
  • Grants powers to “enforce any mitigation measure to address any risk” to national security now and in any “potential future transaction.”
  • Allows the Director of National Intelligence and Secretary of Commerce the authority to universally designate new “Foreign Adversaries” without notifying congress.
  • “Foreign Individuals” can now also be US citizens that are deemed a national security threat.
  • Requires a joint resolution of Congress to overturn.
  • Once designated, the bill grants authority to enforce any action deemed necessary to mitigate the threat, with no due process and few limits on punishments.
  • Authorizes $1,000,000 fine, 20 years in prison and forfeiture of everything you own (no due process).
  • Grants unlimited hiring power to positions of enforcement, unlimited funds with little or no review.
  • Immunity from FOIA…(in other words: secret courts, secret searches, secret siezures, secret punishments).

The idea that the Restrict Act is somehow limited to “foreign” threats is just as laughable as when that assertion was made in 2012 when the “Indefinite Detention” provisions were added to the NDAA of 2012 and equally as unbelievable as the “sunset” provisions added to the 2001 Patriot Act that continues to deny the constitutional limits of government 20 years after its legislative sunset was scheduled to take place. It does absolutely NOTHING to affect the Chinese Communist Party but it certainly opens up a vast opportunity to tyrannizes Americans. And all it took was Tik Tok; that’s how easily some will move to shred the Constitution when the right boogey-man comes along.

If passed the Restrict Act will likely plague the Liberties of Americans for generations to come.  We must act now to prevent this violent attack on our Constitution.  Tell your representative to RESIST the Restrict Act.