Email Sign Up Form

 Sign Up for the KrisAnne Hall Daily Journal Email Alerts


We respect your email privacy

11/29 Bump Stocks: More Than a 2A Thing



The MSM is reporting that President Trump will “outlaw” bumpstocks via executive regulation. See the scope and impact of this executive action in a way that perhaps you haven’t before. Not just a second amendment thing.

Or WATCH the KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube!

11/28 Deconstructing Red Flag Laws

What are the ramifications of everyone’s Right to Keep and Bear Arms??

Today I will do my very best to show you the ins & outs of the concept & practice of Red Flag Laws; the good & the bad. Then we can ask: At what cost is the pursuit of safety & security? How far have we come? How far will we go? What are the REAL solutions?

Don’t forget to like, follow, & subscribe!

or you can WATCH the KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube:

11/27 The Threat of Free Thought in a Post Constitutional Society

Free thought extinguished in the classroom, public forum, and courtrooms. Look at these examples and learn how to take a stand. Mercy Otis Warren gives us a very sobering warning for the day.

Or you can WATCH the KrisAnne Hall Show on YoutTube:

11/26 Do YOU Want To Make America Liberty Again?

Do YOU want to be part of the solution instead of just complaining about the problems? I know this isn’t a bash Hillary – love Trump show, but it ought to be the most important thing you listen to this week. We need to stop expecting the politicians to fix our problems… WE must BE THE SOLUTION. Do you want to make America Liberty Again? Let us help you do that.

or you can WATCH the KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube!

11/24 The Establishing of American Exceptionalism

American Exceptionalism is real. It is not arrogance, it is a fact rooted in our history and those who sacrificed to make Liberty a reality in America. It is not their fault we do not live up to their expectations and the potential they established for us. Join us as we give Thanks to those who began this place of Liberty for all.

Hey everyone! Thank you so much for your support. If you are looking for the Liberty First Gear, please go to Blessings to you!


States Ignoring History, Wisdom & the Uniform Rule of Naturalization

States Ignoring History, Wisdom & the Uniform Rule of Naturalization

By KrisAnne Hall, JD

An non-citizen alien has been appointed to California government and has become the poster child for WHY our founders delegated to Congress the power to create a Uniform Rule of Naturalization.  Other States are allowing non-citizen aliens to vote, run for office, and utilize 

Ironically, there was a discussion during the ratification of our Constitution on why it was necessary to establish a Uniform Rule of Naturalization.  Once again, a disregard for the Constitution and its intent has America experiencing a crisis that our founders sought to prevent.

Prior to our current Constitution, under the Articles of Confederation, each State was left to determine, independently, the terms of citizenship. James Madison, Father of the Constitution, wrote in Federalist 42;

“The dissimilarity in the rules of naturalization, has long been remarked as a fault in our system…”

Madison goes on to describe the condition of confusion thrust upon all the States because of a lack of standard for the benefits of citizenship.  For example, one State would establish a very lax standard for citizenship where another State would establish a very strict standard.  This disparity created chaos when people would travel or move from one State to another.  Madison asks the question, what would happen if a person who is banned from citizenship in one State, obtains citizenship from another State and then demands the benefits of citizenship from that State from which they were originally banned?

“An alien, therefore, legally incapacitated for certain rights in the latter, may, by previous residence only in the former, elude his incapacity;”

Madison then explains to avoid these consequences both “embarrassing” and  “potentially very serious” our Constitution delegated the authority to Congress to establish a uniform rule to obtain the benefits of citizenship.

Liz Mateo, claiming those benefits of citizenship through the State of California, is not a citizen by the terms established through the Constitution by law.  Mateo has lived her life experiencing the benefits of that citizenship she does not legally hold. She got a doctorate level of education from Santa Clara University School of Law.  When she graduated, she was not grateful for these benefits, however, she declared, “[E]verything is dedicated to Oaxaca, Mexico!! to that land that I miss so much.”

In addition to her education, Mateo has now been appointed to serve within the California State government.  As a new member of California’s representative government, one of her chief concerns is that illegal aliens are “under represented” in American government. Mateo clearly has a great deal of confusion about the terms of citizenship established by law. One can only imagine the chaos that would ensue if Mateo were to leave California and expect to experience these same benefits in a State that is actually complying with the terms of citizenship created through the Constitution. As Madison supposed, what will also be the more “serious consequences” when people like Mateo continue to expect the benefits of citizenship while remaining ignorant and even hostile to the Constitution itself?  And what will be the “serious consequences” in all of America if we continue to ignore these historical truths by allowing States like California violate the supreme law of the land?

The governors of every other States must immediately take a stand against this violation of the Constitution.  Each State should issue resolutions of condemnation and sanctions against California until they come into compliance with the terms of the Constitution.  The people must demand that the federal executive branch continue to enforce the Uniform Rule of Naturalization, even in California.  If California refuses to come into compliance with the Constitution the other States need to have a serious discussion amongst each other and Congress regarding the ability of California to remain a part of the Union.

States like California are not just ignoring the Constitution, they are also ignoring the history and wisdom used to write the Constitution.  Their blatant disregard is thrusting America into the embarrassment and chaos our founders actively sought to prevent.

Art Slavery

The Constitution Ended Slavery – Politicians Prolonged It

The Constitution Ended Slavery – Politicians Prolonged It

By KrisAnne Hall, JD


While defending the Constitution I am met often with two questions:  1) If the founders were so great and the Constitution such a great document, why did it preserve slavery?  2) Why did the Constitution treat black people as 3/5th a person?  To understand the truth, we start with some basics…

Read more


Principles & Purpose of the Natural Born Citizen Limitation

Principles & Purpose of the Natural Born Citizen Limitation

by KrisAnne Hall, JD


Our Founders established the criteria of Natural Born Citizen upon our President for a very important reason. Natural Born Citizen meant, to our framers, a child born of two parents who were citizens of the United States at the time of the birth of that child.  If you are not sure of this, or perhaps disagree, please read this article based upon fact & history before you go on:

A person who is born of just one parent who is a citizen of the United States is a citizen by birth, but not Natural Born Citizen.  Someone cannot hold or have held dual citizenship with a foreign country and be a Natural Born Citizen.  The fact that we are confused by this qualification, or perhaps even wish to alter this qualification, must be because we do not understand WHY this qualification was established in the first place.  So, before we take a stand either way, we must consider the reasons why this qualification was established by the framers of the American Constitution.

Read more

Proper Executive Order Enforcing Uniform Rule of Naturalization Part 1

Proper Executive Order Enforcing Uniform Rule of Naturalization Part 1

by KrisAnne Hall, JD

In light of all the debate, confusion, and misinformation, I humbly offer up a teaching tool in the form of a potential executive order to be administered by the President, consistent with both the Constitution and the 14th Amendment; complete with references and explanations to support the authority of this executive order.

I believe and executive order drafted in this manner will clarify any questions about Birth Right Citizenship and the authority of the President to issue an Executive Order on this subject.  Additionally, since we are well aware that any EO written on this topic will be fast tracked to the Supreme Court, an executive order written in this manner will force the Supreme Court to address this issue from more than just a political and popular perspective, but also from an historical, constitutional, and legal perspective: which should be the focus of all judicial opinions.  ~ KrisAnne Hall, JD ~ KrisAnne Hall, JD


Executive Order Enforcing the Constitution and the 14th Amendment to Limit Citizenship as Therein Defined

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including Article 2 section 1, Article 2 section 2 clause 1, Article 2 section 2 clause 3 and pursuant to my oath in Article 2 section 1 clause 8 of the Constitution of the United States of America,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, in order to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, hereby order as follows:

Section 1(a) All executive agencies and their agency directors will follow and enforce the Uniform Rule of Naturalization as ratified by the Legislative branch as long as those laws are made consistent with Article 1 section 8 and Article 6 clause 2 of the Constitution.

(b) All Rules of Naturalization that are made inconsistent with the Constitution will be considered “null and void” by these executive agencies and their directors pursuant to my oath in Article 2 section 1 clause 8 as demanded by the authors of the Constitution, to wit:

“There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void.” Federalist 78

“No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid.” Federalist 78

“…the power of the Constitution predominates. Any thing, therefore, that shall be enacted by Congress contrary thereto, will not have the force of law.” James Wilson, Virginia Ratifying Convention 1787

Section 2(a) the 14th Amendment establishes that “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”  The drafters of this Amendment give sufficient clarity as to the meaning and application of this clause in Congressional Record:

“This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.

This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.  It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States.” The Honorable Jacob M. Howard, US Senator for the State of Michigan, 1868

(b) Pursuant to my obligation to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and consistent with Legislative Intent and the tenor of the commission under which it is to be exercised, all executive agencies and their department directors will no longer accept the birth of a child in the United States as proof of citizenship when the parents of that child are:

  • Visitors to any of the States in these United States;
  • Ambassadors or ministers from other countries to these United States;
  • Foreigners; or
  • Aliens, legal or otherwise.

(c)  This Executive Order does not create any standard for citizenship, but merely enforces the standard that is already in place by proper application of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment.  This Executive Order is not intended to change the status of citizenship for any person who claims that privilege before November 2, 2018.  As president I do not have the constitutional authority to grant citizenship to any alien nor do I have the authority to deny citizenship to those already established as citizens, that is a power delegated to the Legislative Branch.

Section 3.  Pursuant to Article 2 section 1 clause 8, as president of the United States and Chief Executive Officer of the Executive Branch of the United States it is not only within my authority to issue this executive order directing executive agencies and their agency directors on how to faithfully execute the laws of the United States and also faithfully preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, it is also my duty to operate as an effective and co-equal check and balance on federal power when one or more of the branches of that federal government are operating outside the proper delegated power of the Constitution of the United States:

“We see it particularly displayed in all the subordinate distributions of power, where the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that each may be a check on the other that the private interest of every individual may be a sentinel over the public rights.” Federalist 51

“[The Constitution] has more wisely made all the departments co-equal and co-sovereign within themselves…” Thomas Jefferson, 1820

Given the precision with which the Constitution is written and the clear application and purpose directed by the authors of the 14th Amendment, this executive order is not only lawfully given, but responsibly and dutifully authored.

Section 4. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by the Constitution to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.