Tag Archive for: Syria

Government Unconstitutionality Pt.2

King Barry has given us  a great teaching moment. First let us remember we are a government of the people, by the people and for the people. Not a government of politicians, by our state capitals for Washington DC. no matter the level of government, the people just powers to the government. All government receives it’s just power from the consent of the governed. When we forget this we lose that power and lets remember that what distinguishes a kingdom from a republic is that in a kingdom the king holds the power and delegates rights and in a republic the people hold the rights and delegate power. Now lets get on with the lesson starting with the teaching moment given us by King Barry.

Open Letter on Syria

Dear (Senator, Congressman),

As you are pressed to consider launching an attack on the Syrian people and their government I would hope you would consider the following facts.

Our Constitution was created to limit the federal government in its power and authority. The mission statement of the Constitution is contained in the preamble:

We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.(emphasis mine)

The purpose of our Constitution is to “secure the Blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” With that prime directive in mind, it is incumbent upon the federal government to “provide for the common defense.” I would like to draw your attention the word “defense”. This does not authorize the federal government to engage in offensive actions. It is a requirement to defend the Blessings of liberty. This essential principle is further illustrated in a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Elbridge Gerry Philadelphia, Jan. 26, 1799:

“I am for relying, for internal defence (sic), on our militia solely, till actual invasion, and for such a naval force only as may protect our coasts and harbors from such depredations as we have experienced; and not for a standing army in time of peace, which may overawe the public sentiment; nor for a navy, which, by it’s own expenses and the eternal wars in which it will implicate us, will grind us with public burthens, & sink us under them. And I am not for linking ourselves by new treaties with the quarrels of Europe; entering that field of slaughter to preserve their balance….”

What the president is asking you to do is not only contrary to Constitutional principles, it is in violation of federal law. Section 7008 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Act, 2012 (division I of Public Law 112–74; 125 Stat. 1195), declares the United States is legally prohibited from providing foreign assistance to any country whose duly elected head of government is deposed by a military coup d’´etat, or removed in such a way that the military plays a decisive role. What is going on in Syria is a coup in progress. We have no authority provide aid in the overthrow of Syria’s government.

Finally, the assertion made by the president that the use of chemical weapons precipitates a necessity for us to become involved in this is “quarrel”. This issue is not settled however. Although we are being told that chemical weapons where the cause of death of 1,400, the parties responsible for that action cannot be so clearly defined. Several international news sources are now reporting that the “rebels” too have chemical weapons supplied to them by the Saudi Prince Bandar. These reports even indicate that this particular incident was a result of an accidental mishandling of these chemical weapons by the “rebels”. Additionally, many sources are exposing the fact that the “rebels” are not Syrians at all, but Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood forces attempting to overthrow the Syrian government to establish themselves as that governmental power.

Congressman, there are some very serious unanswered questions that MUST be answered before we engage in an action that could have global military implications. (Russia has made their stance very clear)Please consider the following:

  1. What is the “common defense” need for action in Syria? Simply claiming “national security” or “war on terror” is not sufficient to satisfy the standard established by the framers to justify US military action.
  2. How do we justify not only violating the Constitution, but also federal law by aiding a country that is clearly in a military overthrow of power where military force will play a decisive role?
  3. Considering the great human rights violations going on in this world, in other countries (e.g. Slaughter in Democratic Republic of Congo, Angola, Sierra Leone, Mali, China, Philippines, Russia, Sudan, Somalia, Kenya, North Korea, or 1.2 million children enslave in human trafficking every year) how do we justify involving US military forces in a conflict between two factions who are not supporters of Western Liberty, are not trying to establish Liberty with a justified revolution, but simply killing each other in the name of political power and where we will inevitably team up with Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood to start a potential massive global conflict?

These are very serious concerns that are not answered and may I submit, cannot be answered with the information being provided by the president. The first object of my heart is my own country. In that is embarked my family, my fortune, & my own existence. I have neither one minute of interest, nor one fiber of attachment out of it, nor a single motive of preference of any one nation to another, but in proportion as they are more or less friendly to us. All I ask for my representative to have this same dedication to our country first, to our citizens first, to Liberty First!

The honest truth and unavoidable reality is this; you bear a great responsibility in this decision, perhaps one greater than you have considered. You must recognize that generations will be the sharers of this one decision. You cannot make the wrong decision if you remain loyal to the foundations that made this nation great. Do not make this decision out of fear, or a preference for national security. Do not make this decision out of political avarice. Do not make this decision based upon less than complete evidence. You must make this decision with clarity of mind and with evidence beyond every doubt. To do otherwise will be a negligent act perpetrated upon future generations.

Thank you for your time and consideration of these concerns. May God be with you as you do the right thing.


KrisAnne Hall


Can You Take a Tease

To start with I want to tease you a bit by letting you in on a potential project that has the potential for pushing liberty to escape velocity speed. I can’t get  into all the details right now but the dominoes have been falling in place in perfect order and in that spirit I want to ask you for your prayers so that  these  dominoes continue falling into place. Yes I can give you just a small hint. It’s about film. That’s all I’m saying. But that’s not what this show is all about and you should know by now that there’s always more to come from the Liberty First microphone and the KrisAnne Hall show. So just  click the play button.

Show Stalinesque

SHHH! The TRUTH about Syria…

Why aren’t we being told the TRUTH about Syria? Why is this administration and those loyal to it, (McCain, Graham, Boehner, Cantor, etc.) pushing so hard for a war in Syria? Perhaps the FACTS will help us understand what is REALLY going on here. When you are done reviewing the TRUTH the government doesn’t want you to know, you can send this OPEN LETTER to your Senator and House Rep and demand NO ACTION in Syria!

Ready my “OPEN LETTER On Syria”

Nothing but the Facts, Ma’am:

  • Rebel Forces are attacking a Christian Village. The Syrian Army has sent in troops to defend the Christians. Yet, Obama and McCain wants us the fund the Rebels?


  • Obama wants us to believe that the Syrian Army released chemical weapons on its own people. So why did WE TRAIN the Syrian Rebels to use chemical weapons last year?

“The United States and some European allies are using defense contractors to train Syrian rebels on how to secure chemical weapons stockpiles in Syria, a senior U.S. official and several senior diplomats told CNN Sunday.”


  • Obama wants us to believe that the Syrian Army released chemical weapons on its own people and NOT the Rebels, so why did military intelligence report that LAST YEAR the Syrian REBELS were already launching chemical attacks on the Syrian Army and openly bragging about it?

“The terrorists have already thrown three cube-shaped plastic bags towards the [Syrian] army’s forces that killed seven due to the gases emerging from the bags,” a commander of the Syrian Presidential Guard told the Iran-based Al-Alam news channel on Sunday…a recently released video purportedly showing Syrian Islamist rebels testing chemicals weapons on rabbits and threatening to use them against Syria’s Alawite Muslims.

“Your destiny would be the same as them because you are missionaries for Naseeriyah and supporters of Bashar Assad,” text underneath the video read. “We from the Ar-Reeh Asarsar Chemical Battalion, the Destructive Wind Chemical Battalion – we shall kill you all with our chemical weapons.”


  • Should we also conveniently avoid the statements of the rebels themselves that the recent chemical weapon incident was THEIR fault and a result of a mishandling of chemical weapons supplied to them by the Saudis?“They didn’t tell us what these arms were or how to use them,” said a female rebel, referred to as “K” to protect her identity. “We didn’t know they were chemical weapons. We never imagined they were chemical weapons.“When Saudi Prince Bandar gives such weapons to people, he must give them to those who know how to handle and use them,” K continued.


VIDEO Admission: http://www.infowars.com/video-syrian-rebel-admits-using-chemical-weapons/

  • John McCain promises in a town hall meeting that there will be NO BOOTS on the ground. Yet John Kerry says there will be for “chemical weapon extraction”


last year the Pentagon KNEW it would take 75k troops on the ground to extract chemical weapons!


  • And as if we needed further evidence that we have no business in Syria, John Kerry seems very pleased about the fact that the SAUDIs are offering to PAY for our military invasion of Syria. Seriously? Is that what we are now? Paid mercenaries for the Saudi government?

“With respect to Arab countries offering to bear costs and to assist, the answer is profoundly yes,’ Kerry said. ‘They have. That offer is on the table.”


  • Just one more REMINDER…evidence shows that the Saudis not only got Obama into Harvard, but funded his education and has since then regularly funded his campaign.



Now was that so hard? What do you think about this evidence? Let’s hear from the PEOPLE instead of the politicians who seem to be in the pocket of the Saudi government.