Terrorism should never goad us into an avidity to punish. Preserving Liberty should always be our first perspective. We are warned that to act otherwise will always lead to the destruction of Liberty.
Alternatively you can listen to “Terrorism in America” by KrisAnne Hall on YouTube
“Most codes extend their definitions of treason to acts not really against one’s country. They do not distinguish between acts against government, and acts against oppressions of the government. The latter are virtues, yet have furnished more victims to the executioner than the former, because real treasons are rare; oppressions frequent. The unsuccessful strugglers against tyranny have been the chief martyrs of treason laws in all countries.” ~ Thomas Jefferson, Report on Spanish Convention 1792
Alternatively you can listen to “Edward Snowden on Constitution Day” by KrisAnne Hall on YouTube
Treason or Resistance? Lawlessness or defiance? What is the proper reaction to oppressive government?
Alternatively you can listen to the KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube
Some are trying to assert there is actual proof the Star Spangled Banner is racist. Let’s look at that “proof” in the light of history and truth so we can take back the narrative.
Alternatively you can listen “The Star Spangled Banner is Racist?” by KrisAnne Hall on YouTube
Some amazing information can be obtained about our federal government with the proper analysis of this situation…Constitutionally Speaking.
Alternatively you can listen to this edition of The KrisAnne Hall Show on YouTube
Please enjoy a follow-up to the article “Hillary Clinton- Running For Her Life” by my friend Robert Townsend. ~ KrisAnne
The Corrupt Rug, Pulled…
by Robert Townsend
I was already considering a quick follow up to my previous essay (Running for Her Life) but recent events have unfolded which forces me to get my thoughts in front of you, dear reader, earlier than I expected. I do this to provide some perspective for the likely fallout of Hillary Clinton’s recent, ehem, medical event.
In my most recent essay, I posited that HRC is running for president, not for any grandiose or altruistic sense of duty or to make history (herstory?) as the first female American chief executive, but rather to make good on corrupt promises she has made to all the shiny despots the world over. But now it appears that the expectations of her coronation have gone a bit wobbly.
If we were to walk in her sensible shoes for a moment, it becomes clear that every time that she or her sycophants announced her excellent medical health, the goal was not to keep the party faithful on board or to win over that “Bucket of Deplorables” to her side. Remember, she doesn’t need you or your vote; the election is all but stolen already. But in order for that to happen, she must maintain access to the money that finances her usurpation.
So if the assurances of good health weren’t meant for the voters, who were they for? Her financiers. They, above all else, is what keeps Hillary in the game. The last thing she needs is for her benefactors to begin to doubt that their horse might actually be sickly. If her financiers see that their money is not invested in a sure thing (as any money-wise person is apt to do), they very well may pull the rug out from under her and stop throwing good money after bad. This must be avoided at all costs. I wonder what their opinions were when it was reported that an ambulance was now part of their candidate’s motorcade?
And all this was before HRC’s latest Weekend-At-Bernie’s episode. And thanks to the video that is now circulating around the internet (and the offices of Chinese and Russian Foreign Intelligence as well), the media can no longer run interference and call accusations of her poor health a conspiracy theory.
If the conversations were not already happening in the dark and smoky back rooms of Hillary and Obama’s masters, they most certainly are now.
The string pullers who are actually financing her campaign and expecting their quid pro quo must now seriously doubt that she can even make it to electionday. Her illness(es?) is/are now so transparent that even the co-opted media must discuss it in serious terms. This is huge; the smoke is lifting.
So the puppeteers must now make a choice:
Do they continue throwing good money after bad to get a losing horse across the finish line and get nothing in return or do they stop funding her altogether and keep their powder dry for a time when they can have more influence? WWSD? (What Would Soros Do?)
As part of the theatre that is the current general election, we, as serfs, will never see or know that her money well had dried up. If we knew just how much external, foreign money was spent to feed Dutchess Clinton’s avarice, the truth would be exposed that she never represented you, her loyal subjects.
Instead, we will likely read “due to health reasons, HRC has decided to pull out of the race” which wouldn’t be altogether untrue!
But withdrawing from the race has its own complications. If she pulls out, the DNC and its fiduciary masters will then have to deal with the chaotic aftermath of HRC “suspending her campaign.”
According to DNC rules, that means Sanders is automatically nominated. Talk about a twist worthy of a John Grisham novel…The underdog wins in the end, the Bad News Bears bats in a triple to win the game, the nerdy free-love freeloader gets the cheerleader.
The DNC rules of course, mean absolutely nothing to an organization that invented “Super Delegates.” Don’t be surprised when Sanders “graciously and humbly refuses” the nomination, preferring to spend time with his family, all the while with a .38 snub nose in his back.
Ironically, Sanders at the moment is the only democrat candidate that could actually give Trump a run for his money. Not because Sanders’ ideas are so much better (they’re really more of a punchline), but because Sanders voters are so ignorant to economics, loyal to their ignorance and excited to vote for a man who (just as Trump) rails against the corruption of the world around us.
So if HRC loses her funding, and Sanders plays the elder statesman with a black eye and refuses the nomination, what then? The DNC forced into a last minute replacement (voted on by nobody) such as an Elizabeth Warren or Joe Biden?
The answer to that question is simply, “who knows?” Who knows what that den of vipers is capable of?
But at the end of the day, understand that if Her Highness does indeed “suspend her campaign” it most certainly was not to recuperate. She simply lost the faith of those who were paying her bills, despots and dictators.
Sincerely,
Fascism: a political system in which the government controls business and labor and opposition is not permitted. Rand Paul exposes the perfect example of Fascism in America…did you hear?
Alternatively you can listen to “Rand Paul Exposes Fascism in America” by KrisAnne Hall on YouTube
Now that Obama has nominated the first Muslim Judge, what should Americans be considering? Be careful, the standard you apply on others will be applied on you.
Alternately you can listen to “Obama Nominates the First Muslim Judge” by KrisAnne Hall on YouTube
Yes. The Great American Gun Ban is here now…it is time to open our eyes and see, open our ears and hear.
Alternatively you can listen to ‘The Great American Gun Ban” by Krisanne Hall on YouTube
This is a guest article by my friend, Robert Townsend. Hope you enjoy…I sure did! ~ KrisAnne
As if you hadn’t heard enough political speculating, here’s some more…
I’ve been wondering. Why the hell is Hillary Clinton “running” for president anyway? I mean, I think we can all agree that Hillary isn’t (nay, can’t) run anywhere with fresh health concerns being revealed daily. By any count, her “Foundation” has raked in untold millions. Of course, those are just the millions we know about; the number could actually stretch into the billions, but let’s just stick to what we know for now.
So the question remains: Why is she running? She has likely been suffering from a variety of illnesses for quite a while which is just now finally taking hold in the electorate’s consciousness. But she’s of course known about her weak health for quite a 
while.
She has more money than any person could hope to collect in a hundred lifetimes, so why not sit back and enjoy her retirement and grandchildren free from the financial worries that her political and duplicitous machinations have doomed the rest of the country (and world?) to? Surely hundreds of millions of dollars is ‘enough’ to secure herself and her family’s needs, is it not? In comparison, even at his worst, ole FDR himself didn’t look nearly as frail as Hillary does today, and that man had polio, in the 1920’s!
The Clinton family and their “foundation” has collected hundreds of millions of dollars, that we know about, over the years. I believe it’s safe to say that they have no mortgages, no credit card bills hanging over their head, no car payments, etc. Just what do you think they plan to do with all that dough? Make more dough? Paraphrasing our good friend Harrison J. Bounel (042-68-4425), “I do think that at some point you’ve made enough money” (2010). Is that not a sound financial recommendation, or am I expecting too much that our betters live by the words they would doom the rest of us to?
So, if the Clinton Nostra has enough money to live on for the rest of their lives, why bother to continue in the 
fight for the presidency? Their comfort is assured and her ill-health would argue to slow down; but she doesn’t. Why not?
All the pieces are there for anyone willing to put them together. We are only learning now, as a country, how the Clintons turned the State Department (and her senate office before that? And Bill’s presidency before that?) into a political cash register. The entire Clinton clan has raised the stakes of pay-for-play beyond the dreams of the
Borgias. It’s just out-moded and doddery thinking to believe that a secret can remain a secret in the information age.
Looking at her pathetic campaign and the way she obtained her party’s nomination (she didn’t win it), we can only assume that she and her courtiers fully anticipated a typically milquetoast Republican candidate to run against her (all but ensuring an easy victory as the ones before). How else to explain the attempted use of the tried and true tropes of calling anyone running against her a racist, sexist, “homo-phobe” or bigot? The fact that the current Republican nominee is immune to her attacks seems to escape Duchess Clinton and her advisors.
Not to get off topic, but Hillary’s intent to steal the election just as she stole the primary from Sanders is glaringly obvious. Consider for a moment that the purpose of a real election is to convince more people than your opponent that you are the better choice, right? So, when Hillary is calling Trump’s supporters Racists, Bigots and “homo-phobes” this shows that she has literally no intent to convince the fence-sitters that she is the better candidate. Why? Because doesn’t need your 
vote and she doesn’t care about your vote. She didn’t need the Sanders supporters to change their minds and she certainly doesn’t need yours either.
Getting back on topic: The gargantuan speaking fees for Bill and Hillary are also a huge give-away as to what her intentions are once she is in office. Is it possible that Bill and Hillary were selling access to the Presidency of the United States with the justified expectation of her coronation? Is it possible that we should we look back on the first Clinton presidency with a more jaundiced eye? I hear the White House Lincoln B&B makes a killer waffle in the morning…
Of course she’s selling access, don’t fool yourself. We already know she’s willing to sell access ex post facto as revealed by the most recent news articles. Expanding her market to ex ante is the only logical next step.
One wonders: has she considered the likely fallout from all of her creditors if she lost the presidency (again)? I wonder if Harry Reid might be able to offer some insight into the thugs they do business with and their understanding nature when he couldn’t deliver on promises he made due to those pesky little people’s unreasonable expectations to keeping their own private property?
So if Julius and Ethel Clinton have indeed sold out their country based on ‘future consideration,’ and it is shaping up that the race is not as easily won as her vote-rigging experts have told her, it is likely that her creditors may not take kindly to her inability to follow-through on the promised access and favors she so willfully promised…and she knows it.
And there we have it. For all intents and purposes, Hillary Clinton can’t stop running for the presidency. She can’t retire to the country and her dirty money. She has pre-sold so much access to so many despots and crony “capitalists” that she must continue. You don’t think those who bought that access would let her off the hook so easily, do you? Did Harry Reid?
In spite of her very ill health, it appears that Hillary Clinton is, literally, running for her life.
Sincerely,